CaCas dice y miente: Que se le deben 26 millones por un juicio laboral, pero todo era Falso, aqui las evidencias. El día 20 de junio de 2013 por el chat de Facebook que teníamos la Querellada me pide ayuda para resolver el tema de plan de salud ya que no tenía isapre y el tema financiero ya que no tenía cuenta bancaria, y acordamos hacer un contract with an “inflated” and fictitious salary as can be seen in the evidence.
Evidence – Facebook Chat June 20, 2013
Then on June 25, 2013 he pressured me again because he needed the contract with an “inflated” and fictitious salary, I must admit that I acted naively and trustingly with the intention of providing support for the precarious living conditions she was experiencing, all of this is found textually in the evidence. The above unfortunately demonstrates that the Defendant abused said trust, using the contract with an “inflated” and fictitious salary as a tool to seek economic benefit by fabricating a labor lawsuit that is ideologically false because the action that gives rise to the claim is false.
Evidence. Facebook conversation on June 25, 2013.
Then on June 26, 2013, he confirmed again that he actually needed the contract because he no longer wanted to go to Motoboy to work.
This action (Ideologically false contract), far from being an act of bad faith on my part, was a gesture of support towards who was my partner at that time, this is the context of the genesis of the threats made by the defendant are based on a Machiavellian construct of coercion and future control that the defendant later used in her favor and therefore her claims are false from the Genesis as shown in the evidence and that then said threats are transformed into concrete actions of defamation, insults and lies and that is when the crime of threats is consummated, it is also good to emphasize that everything is based on something FALSE and where the defendant took advantage of me and my intentions to help her.
EN 
ES